KPMG's US hiring runs on Avature. You browse roles on the kpmguscareers.com career site, a separate front end reported to be built on Phenom, but when you apply the flow hands off to KPMG's Avature tenant: the live job board sits at uskpmgats.avature.net, and the apply host us-talentcommunity.kpmg.com resolves to the same Avature backend. You create an account and submit there, so a real vendor parser reads your resume before a recruiter does. It is the same ATS Deloitte runs, not the Workday PwC runs, not the SuccessFactors EY runs.
One accurate correction matters before you apply. KPMG is not on Taleo. A Taleo career site does appear in searches, but it belongs to KPMG South Africa, a separate member firm, not the US firm. The US apply chain runs entirely through Avature, for both experienced and campus hires, the latter through a separate campus Avature portal. So two of the Big Four, KPMG and Deloitte, run Avature, more than any other single ATS in the group.
What that changes: because a vendor ATS ranks your resume before any human, the mechanics matter twice over. Use a single column, keep contact details in the body rather than the header, use a real text layer with standard section headers like Experience, Education, and Skills, avoid tables, text boxes, and graphics, ship a DOCX or a clean text-layer PDF, and mirror the posting's exact titles and skills so the parser ranks the file. The video interviews and any service-line round are later, separate stages, not the resume screen.
The sufficient condition is content that proves value: a specific, quantified client or program outcome on every line, mapped to the five values below. Keyword-matched formatting gets you ranked and read; demonstrated impact gets you advanced.