How Sarah Went From 47 Rejections to 5 Interviews in One Week
ResumeAdapter TeamShare this post
Send this to a friend who’s also job searching.
How Sarah Went From 47 Rejections to 5 Interviews in One Week
🚨 47 applications. Zero responses. Sound familiar?
Sarah was qualified for every job she applied to. But her resume had 3 fixable issues that ATS systems rejected automatically. Here's how she went from endless silence to 5 interviews in one week.
The Problem
Sarah had a problem. She'd been a marketing manager for six years. She had the skills. She had the experience. She had recommendations on LinkedIn from former colleagues and clients.
But after 47 applications over three months, she'd heard back from exactly zero companies.
No interviews. No phone screens. Not even a "thanks, but no thanks" email.
Just silence.
"I started questioning everything," Sarah told us. "Was my experience not good enough? Was I applying to the wrong jobs? Should I have gone to a different school?"
The self-doubt was crushing. Every rejection (or worse, every ghosting) felt personal.
The Discovery
The problem wasn't Sarah. It was her resume (or more specifically, how Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) were reading it).
When Sarah uploaded her resume to ResumeAdapter's free ATS scanner, her ATS score was 54/100.
That number told the whole story. Over 75% of companies use ATS software to filter resumes before they reach a human recruiter. And Sarah's resume was being filtered out every single time.
What the analysis revealed:
Missing Keywords (12 critical gaps)
- Job descriptions asked for "content strategy," "campaign management," and "marketing automation"
- Sarah's resume said "managed content," "ran campaigns," and "used email tools"
- Same experience, different words (but ATS systems couldn't make the connection)
Formatting Issues (3 major problems)
- Two-column layout confused the ATS parser
- Custom header with tables broke the parsing system
- Skills section buried at the bottom instead of near the top
Weak Bullet Points (No measurable impact)
- "Responsible for social media marketing"
- "Managed email campaigns"
- "Worked with design team"
These told recruiters what Sarah did, but not what she achieved.
💡 Before Sarah rewrote anything, she scanned her resume to see how ATS was reading it.
The Solution
Sarah spent 20 minutes making the recommended changes:
1. Added Industry-Specific Keywords
Before:
Managed content creation for company blog and social media
After:
Developed content strategy and managed content creation across company blog, social media, and email marketing, increasing organic traffic by 45%
The second version hits multiple keywords from the job description: "content strategy," "content creation," "social media," "email marketing" (all terms that appeared in her target postings).
2. Fixed Formatting Issues
- Switched from two-column to single-column layout
- Removed custom header with tables
- Used standard section headers (Experience, Skills, Education)
- Moved Skills section to the top
These changes made her resume readable by ATS parsers.
3. Rewrote Bullet Points to Include Measurable Results
Before:
Responsible for social media marketing
After:
Built social media marketing strategy that grew followers from 2,000 to 15,000 in 6 months and increased engagement rate by 300%
Before:
Managed email campaigns
After:
Designed and executed email marketing campaigns reaching 50,000+ subscribers, achieving 32% open rate (15% above industry average) and generating $200K in revenue
Every bullet point now answers: What did you do? How did you do it? What was the result?
The New Score
After making these changes, Sarah rescanned her resume.
New ATS score: 91/100
That 37-point jump meant the difference between being filtered out and being seen.
The Results
Sarah started applying again (this time with her optimized resume).
Within one week:
✅ 5 interview requests
Companies that had previously ghosted her were now calling back
✅ 3 second-round interviews
She made it past the phone screen to meet with hiring managers
✅ 1 job offer
From a company she'd applied to twice before (and been rejected both times)
"The interviews felt different," Sarah said. "The recruiters actually referenced specific bullet points from my resume. They could see my impact immediately."
Two weeks later, Sarah accepted a Senior Marketing Manager position at a fast-growing tech company. The salary was 20% higher than her previous role.
What Changed?
It wasn't Sarah's experience. It wasn't her qualifications. It wasn't her cover letter.
It was three fixable issues:
- Wrong keywords (easily fixed)
- Bad formatting (20 minutes to fix)
- Weak bullet points (30 minutes to rewrite)
That's it.
Your Turn: Could You Have the Same Issues?
If you're experiencing what Sarah experienced:
- Qualified for the jobs you're applying to
- Strong experience and skills
- But getting no responses
Your resume might have the same fixable issues.
The questions to ask yourself:
-
Are you using the exact keywords from job descriptions?
Not just similar words (the exact words). ATS systems are literal. -
Is your resume ATS-friendly?
Single column, standard headers, no tables or text boxes? -
Do your bullet points show measurable impact?
Not just what you did, but what you achieved?
If you answered "no" or "I'm not sure" to any of these questions, your resume is likely being filtered out before a human ever sees it.
Get Your Free ATS Score
The same tool Sarah used is available for free.
Upload your resume and get:
- Your ATS compatibility score (0-100)
- Exact keywords you're missing
- Formatting issues that break ATS parsers
- Suggestions to improve each section
Don't guess which keywords you're missing.
👉 Scan Your Resume for Missing Keywords — Free
Get your ATS score, missing keywords, and improvement guidance in 30 seconds.
Sarah's Advice for Job Seekers
We asked Sarah what she'd tell other job seekers who are struggling:
"Stop blaming yourself. I spent three months thinking I wasn't good enough, when the reality was just that my resume wasn't getting past the robots. Once I fixed the technical issues, the interviews came flooding in. It's not you (it's how you're presenting yourself on paper)."
The takeaway: Most resume problems aren't about your experience. They're about optimization.
And optimization is fixable.
Want to share your success story? Email us at success@resumeadapter.com